La Peur dans la peau: l'héritage de Bourne
268 user reviews
6.8
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
7 1 |
7.5 6 |
6.6 15 |
6.2 33 |
6.7 60 |
6.6 58 |
6.6 174 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
8.3 3 |
8 13 |
6.3 14 |
7.5 25 |
7.5 17 |
7.4 74 |
| Total: Votes: |
7 1 |
7.8 9 |
7.3 30 |
6.3 51 |
7 92 |
6.7 79 |
6.8 268 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 268)
Slow pace, barely any action in the first half, what does this movie have to do with the first 3? How were they able to spend 125M$ and get such a lousy result?
| 5/10 | zygoto78@ - 274 reviews 31.1.2013 - age: 26-35 |
Okay movie, worth the watch, beginning was long before the action really started.
| 7/10 | xd.dreidiz.xd@ - 6 reviews 16.12.2012 - age: 13-17 |
It was pretty slowish to start with, could have been shorter but it picked up towards the very end, that was the part I was waiting thru out. A long wait.
| 7/10 | shazjoao@ - 1748 reviews 11.12.2012 |
Absolutely first rate as older Bourne series. This new guy has the zest and gusto to pull it off well. Great action--love the car chases and stunts. This is well filmed; slick and professional. A+
| 10/10 | dubaidoubledoc@ - 16 reviews 22.11.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Wow! What a sweet ride! So much action, suspense and thrills from beginning to end. This next guy after Bourne has tall shoes to fill, but does so expertly. Great film overall and I look forward to the next one!
| 10/10 | jacki_007@ - 7 reviews 19.11.2012 - age: 18-25 |
This movie gave me a headache, to many run and chase scenes.
| 6/10 | idonda@ - 38 reviews 18.11.2012 - age: 50+ |
If you're a true Bourne fan and afficionado, you'll love it. Danny Craig is a superb actor and plays the next Bourne in a sequel after Jason or Matt Damon. Great action, lots of exciting chases and stunts and he gets the beautiful girl in the end. FRIGGIN' AWESOME!
| 10/10 | toothdoc2000@ - 17 reviews 17.11.2012 - age: 50+ |
Disappointing. A few action sequences with a whole lot yapping. Ed Norton's scenes were tedious and annoying. There were a couple times where you just shake your head and say that's just dumb. Reminded me of an Outer Limits episode mixed with the Lawnmower Man but not in any sort of great way.
| 5/10 | parker_2@ - 299 reviews 8.11.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Great Show. Plenty of action. Slightly long. Lost some of the carry through of previous shows.
| 8/10 | fozzy@ - 2 reviews 31.10.2012 - age: 50+ |
Enjoyable movie, but a little disappointing.
| 7/10 | teresa_tiemstra@ - 5 reviews 27.10.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Action packed till the end, great weapons and tactics, fantastic story line, edge of your seat moments, will see the next one [...]
| 8/10 | yvon412001@ - 13 reviews 21.10.2012 - age: 50+ |
I love action movies but this was way too different from other Bourne movies. The first hour was boring. Matt Damon would've played a much better role if he returned but didn't.
| 2/10 | metalandy2000@ - 85 reviews 17.10.2012 - age: 36-49 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Talk about Jason Bourne, so where the hell was he? Not in this movie but they mention him so much you think he would make an appearance. And I wish he would! Action scenes were good but we needed Jason Bourne!
| 6/10 | rfergi_4@ - 2 reviews 16.10.2012 - age: 36-49 |
It seemed like the only point of this movie was to set up for another movie. Come on man you gotta give me something, otherwise it's just flogging the dolphin :)
| 4/10 | rubix_world@ - 75 reviews 10.10.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Big fan of the original trilogy with Matt Damon... this one has a different approach... but still interesting...
| 7/10 | smilingcuteartist@ - 3 reviews 8.10.2012 - age: 50+ |
Great story line with plenty of action. Never a dull moment.
| 9/10 | keithw2010@ - first review 6.10.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I enjoyed watching this movie... It could have been a lot better. It wasn't good but wasn't bad either.
| 6/10 | baby_cakes_22@ - 67 reviews 3.10.2012 - age: 26-35 |
This is sort of a spin off of the original Bourne series. Lots of action; car chases, different venues and martial art fight scenes, that we have come to love with the Bourne series. Downside is that there is no Matt Daemon :( Worth watching on Netflix.
| 6/10 | vibratone@ - 35 reviews 2.10.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Stay away from this movie do not waste your time or money, I'm into action movies. Liked the Bourne so far but this one was like watching a Steven Seagal remake or something in that range. Waste of money and time!
| 1/10 | argotefranco@ - 2 reviews 26.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Had Nothing to do with the other movies. But was entertaining.
| 6/10 | pam@ - 8 reviews 25.9.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I found it long and boring and way too much like the first Bourne movie. The action parts are too drawn out especially the Manila motor bike scene. I also found it too all over the place and at times hard to follow. This needs to be the last one.
| 4/10 | port79@ - 2 reviews 22.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
The first third of this movie simply didn't make sense. The editing was terrible and the story was choppy. I'm 58 and I took a 17-year-old and a 16-year-old to see it and none of us could figure out what was going on and who was who. There were a number of good, experienced actors in this movie and they did their job - I just don't understand where the director's head was at. As the movie went on, the plot became clearer and there were some fun action scenes. BTW, I rode motorcycles for ten years and rode one across Canada from Vancouver to Toronto and back to Vancouver through the States and I assure you that you can't do that on a motorcycle (any more info would be a spoiler) Bottom line: Since we more or less enjoyed two/thirds of the movie that's the score.
| 6/10 | markrichards@ - 26 reviews 22.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
I absolutely loved Jeremy Renner in this. Rachel Weisz was lovely also; a high suspense thriller, very enjoyable ride.
| 8/10 | julie.guimond@ - 6 reviews 20.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
The scenes belatered wasting a lot of time to tell a good story to the start of a new Bourne series. If they do decide to make another Bourne movie, I hope they fix all the glitches that this one has.
| 6/10 | spacecharm@ - 70 reviews 20.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Yep that's right an 8. Renner and Rachel are perfectly cast, it's a good story somewhat believable, overall better than either of the previous 2 installments. Well done action sequences with no intentional humor to dumb down the mood.
| 8/10 | ralphgumdrop@ - 66 reviews 19.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
Long, didn't really tie anything together. Nothing like the other Bourne movies.
| 4/10 | jonathanbeaudoin172@ - first review 15.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Good action movie! Jeremy Renner looks great in this character and certainly has "Bourne"" in his blood. Great acting from Rachel Weisz.
| 8/10 | monicafia@ - 159 reviews 13.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
A lot of fast action and at times breathtaking. However, I found some of the scenes too long and specially the motorbike chase in Manilla. The film itself could be a bit shorter. But if you liked the previous ones, go see it. It is entertaining.
| 7/10 | nick_ra@ - 73 reviews 13.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
It is so far fetched not even I believed most of it and I have a great imagination. Also ended leaving you wanting although I think that was done so they can continue it with another movie including Jason Bourne.
| 3/10 | jgould@ - first review 12.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
Great action flick! It's one of those movies that you get lost in and forget about what time it is and is probably one of the better ones I've seen this year. The motorcycle chase was a bit annoying because it went on too long, other than that it was a good movie. Jeremy Renner played his role really well. When you're watching this movie, just put aside that Matt Damon was in the last shows. This movie is not about him... and it's obvious the creators left it open for a sequel, so maybe Matt and Jeremy will team up in the next one!
| 8/10 | creativefluke@ - 3 reviews 12.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
Horribly disjointed script. The "Bourne" name is used to garner sales. They tried unsuccessfully to interrelate this lousy movie to the original Bourne series and it was a complete waste of time and terribly disappointing. Don't go under any circumstance.
| 1/10 | doncameron@ - 3 reviews 11.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It's similar to the first Bourne movie. Different actors and the only difference is the lead character knows who he is. I actually fell asleep watching this movie which is hard to do in a loud theatre.
| 1/10 | mrempel1975@ - first review 10.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Good acting. Better than the other Bourne with Matt Damon who didn't have a real killer profile for the role...
| 10/10 | julienfiset@ - first review 10.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Better than I thought it would be. Good story & action ++. Looking forward to future Bourne movies! Especially if Jason Bourne comes back!
| 9/10 | zircon_59@ - 2 reviews 10.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
If you want to sit down and watch a good action movie like I did you will like it. They did a great job in relating the Bourne movies with this one. Sit and enjoy.
| 8/10 | isabelchiro@ - first review 9.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Where have you gone Matt Damon, our nation turns its lonely eyes to you, boo, hoo, hoo.
| 6/10 | dar@ - first review 8.9.2012 |
Nothing thrilled me. It just wasted my time waiting for this movie. So unreal with the Filipinos... scared to see white people and thought she's a robber? Duh... not so Filipino. And Filipino can speak english especially when they are living in Manila... the pharmacist giving instructions for meds. Please be realistic next time.
| 5/10 | clarisesaphire777@ - first review 8.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
It is a fairly complicated movie and covers a bigger map then previous jason bourne trilogy. The action scenes are exciting but I still prefer Matt Damon as he acted out so well being not knowing who himself is and what he supposed to do.
| 7/10 | k0952069037@ - 6 reviews 8.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
First off this movie had great action sequences and there were many parts that just caught me off guard and were not predictable at all. The moves were clever and very fun to watch. Another major part I like about this, SPOILER HERE, is that it's not exactly like other action movies. In all others there is a hot girl and they always end up making out and having sex. This one was different because they didn't even kiss at all. I thought it was great that they showed them connecting by pointing the camera at their hands when they held each other's. It was sweet and held a lot more meaning than just making out. I loved this movie! I hope there is a sequel :)
| 9/10 | oshie007@ - 7 reviews 7.9.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Only Hollywood could make such a movie. In fact, it is not a movie. It is just a dragged-out television commercial, with pictures and scenes erratically jumping back and forth with little or any connection. There is no camera telling a continuous story, - if at all there is a story.
| 1/10 | reviewer@ - first review 7.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
Sure is a sequel but is a nice addition to the Bourne franchise. I found very exciting action sequences worthy of the legacy. Don't miss it!
| 9/10 | rocco.dref@ - 4 reviews 7.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
Jeremy Renner does a great job in this Bourne franchise and people should stop comparing him to Matt Damon. The characters are different and are the product of different programs. If the viewer has not seen any of the Bourne movie, then the plot will be too difficult to understand. They are a lot of great action scenes which most of them were done by Jeremy Renner. Edward Norton is great at playing the cold, caculated conspiracy man. I hope that we will see more of Jeremy Renner in another Bourne movie.
| 8/10 | jocelynedansereau@ - 9 reviews 7.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
If you aren't familiar with the first three then this isn't for you because you'll be left in the dust but if you are, then you'll be sorry if you miss this one. It's a mind-stretcher for sure 'tho mostly because the relatively simply plot - as with all Bourne plots - is sandwiched between fast editing action scenes and other mundane story lines which make sense every ten to fifteen minutes or so but well worth the dollar; gives you the feeling that you're actually intelligent even though your IQ is questionable.
| 7/10 | idiotwind@ - 17 reviews 5.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
8.5 would be my vote, good movie, good plot great actors. If you like what is behind the scenes in the 1st three movies you will love this one.
| 8/10 | jmartin@ - 7 reviews 5.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Fun & entertaining!!! It ties up the Bourne series nicely... exciting action sequences... good acting... true to the spirit of the original!
| 9/10 | thewonderof10@ - first review 4.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
The best film that I have not seen for a couple of years.
| 9/10 | michaeldatso@ - first review 4.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Did you see ''La Peur dans la peau: l'héritage de Bourne''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
